Currently, we are using Wildfire 2.0. Our PC design group uses PADs Layout 2005. These packages interface in agreement with IDF 3.0. Our products require mechanical interface with the PCB's to deal with EMI/RFI issues, critical to their operation. Therefore, we need to know locations of track and planes on the outer layers of the board. After providing the PC designer with the physical parameters, we receive the .emn and .emp files for board layout and component placement. We also receive AutoCAD files to import the layout of the outer board layers. This involves additional steps in translation of the data, which I believe cause a decrease in the accuracy of the translated data. We have been successful in using this method, but I have heard of improvements in these processes with new versions of software.<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
ffice
ffice" />
We will be upgrading to Wildfire 4.0 in the near future. Information (that I have gathered) speaks of WF 4.0 being able to deal with PC data in agreement with IDF 4.0. In looking at brief descriptions, it states that WF 4.0 can read in these outer layers, directly from the .emn file; even interior layers, if needed. I would like to know if this is true.
I will be participating in the PTC Webinar
We will be upgrading to Wildfire 4.0 in the near future. Information (that I have gathered) speaks of WF 4.0 being able to deal with PC data in agreement with IDF 4.0. In looking at brief descriptions, it states that WF 4.0 can read in these outer layers, directly from the .emn file; even interior layers, if needed. I would like to know if this is true.
I will be participating in the PTC Webinar