daveyk_belgium
New member
I have now worked for two large organisations that have severe problems using massive Unigraphics assemblies inside Pro/ENGINEER.<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
ffice
ffice" />
Third-parties are the design responsibles for modules used within our systems, and they use some Unigraphics.
We need to include the geometry of their modules in our systems, but it needs to be manageable (speed/display), and solid. Solid geometry is required to allow us to do interference checking and generate cross-sections.
I can successfully import a Unigraphics assembly into a Pro/ENGINEER assembly, the resulting ProE assembly being completely solid.
Why don
Third-parties are the design responsibles for modules used within our systems, and they use some Unigraphics.
We need to include the geometry of their modules in our systems, but it needs to be manageable (speed/display), and solid. Solid geometry is required to allow us to do interference checking and generate cross-sections.
I can successfully import a Unigraphics assembly into a Pro/ENGINEER assembly, the resulting ProE assembly being completely solid.
Why don