Is it more worth getting a workstation with a better graphics card, or a beefier processor? It seems to me that Creo isn't heavily dependent on graphics hardware, versus NX and other programs. I'm a college student trying to admin a Formula SAE team's CAD work (Creo), and I also do freelance video and photo work.
I'm debating between a high end Sager, which would have a desktop class i7 loaded inside and a GeForce card, versus something from a traditional ISV like a Dell Precision which would have a weaker mobile i7 but a M3000M / M5000M. I know the consensus is to get a certified rig, but just wondering whether anyone had experience on choosing a faster CPU or GPU on Creo.
From my research on Specviewperf benchmarks, it seems that Creo is not as sensitive to GPU; it looks like the Maxwell GeForces trade blows with the Quadros, which is interesting on the NX benchmarks, the Quadros absolutely annihilate the GeForces. If that is true, it seems like I'd get more performance by going with a beefier processor and retain a better GPU for Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects, etc.
Sorry for not replying. I went back in and was able to double click and get the properties box. No idea how I fixed the issue.
Interesting thing is, my coworker ran into this issue just recently....
I advise you to look-up config.pro settings for drawings.
cleanup_drawing_dependencies is one of the setting I think there are others too.
I have had success doing clean-ups with the settings....
If you have deleted everything from the drawing, and it still doesn't work, why not just delete the drawing and start over? On the other hand, having an extra empty model in the drawing doesn't...
Hello everyone: I have a question about tool path,like the picture. How can I achieve such approach and exit. thanks ma
about approach and exit