Continue to Site

Welcome to MCAD Central

Join our MCAD Central community forums, the largest resource for MCAD (Mechanical Computer-Aided Design) professionals, including files, forums, jobs, articles, calendar, and more.

Video Memory or CPU Speed?

kurlee daddee

New member
What is more important for running large assemblies and parts with lots of features. A machine with super fast CPU's like Dual Core Intels, or a machine with a lot of video memory? Obviously a combination of both would be ideal, but I am not rich and can't afford a $5k computer.


I still have a post running in the hardware section about buying a Mac and running Solidworks. It will work with Bootcamp with no problems. But, I am trying to decide on whether I should buy a machine with the fastest processors available (two3.0Ghz Dual Core Intels) or a video card with 512mb or more video memory. I am also buying this machine with 2GB worth of RAM.
 
I have been working with some folks at SEMA. Their large assemblies consist of full vehicles, i.e. trucks, cars, etc. 4gb of ram plus 1gb video and a fast cpu seems to do the trick, well, it's never really fast enough. I am currently running 4gb ram, with a 512mb video, it's a bit slower but efficient.
 
I just went through this exercise. The information I have indicates that CPU speed is somewhat more important than video card performance - IF your video card is adequate to run SW. But the video card is a close second.

I'd order it as:
- Get a good, solid, SW-approved video card.
- Get as much RAM as you can (At least 4 Gb - RAM is cheap)
- Get as much single/dual-core CPU as you can justify. Don't get a quad-core.
- Get the fastest hard drive you can justify

In each case there will be a pricing breakpoint that will prevent you from going any bigger/faster on your budget.

These links may help you decide bang for the buck:

[url]http://www.solidworks.com/pages/services/Tech_Tips/TT_Choose System.html[/url]
http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_11761.html
[url]http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/workstation-graphics-card s-charts/specapc-solidworks-2007-cpu,125.html [/url]
[url]http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/workstation-shootout,172 1-8.html[/url]
[url]http://designsmarter.typepad.com/devonsowell/2008/04/solidwo rks-perf.html[/url]
 
Sean is right, SolidWorks uses the CPU way more than the
vid card. And since SW is a single threaded process
software, so a quad core isn't necessary, but if you want
to do anything else in the background, it's a good idea
to have more rather than less.

As for running SW on a Mac, it's just not economical. You
can get a bada$$ PC set up for way cheaper, and it will
probably outperform the Mac just because the software is
designed for a Windows environment. Maybe I'm oldschool
and that's changing, but it's not like Photoshop or any
other program that has a background in Mac language.

If you can, invest in a Solidstate hard drive for your
primary drive, and run a raid 0 on two mechanical drives
for everything else.
 

Sponsor

Articles From 3DCAD World

Back
Top