Join our MCAD Central community forums, the largest resource for MCAD (Mechanical Computer-Aided Design) professionals, including files, forums, jobs, articles, calendar, and more.
Suggestions for rules
for keep it Simple competition
User can enter competition ONLY by filing wish to be competitor.
In wish must be:
1. Country and Town from where is competitor,
2. Version of ProEngineer he uses,
3. Years of experience he have.
Competition task and time for work will be unknown until the start of
competition, and it will not be something specific, but something like this:
That should be something found in the bathroom and can fit in 2 foot cube
(translated in mm and inch in case of European competitors).
What points will grade:
1. Modeling
1 2 3 points
2. Creativity
1 2 3
points
3. Presentation 1
2 3 points
What will be accepted?
In first stage before finishing poling for top 20 next materials will be
accepted
1. Pictures of top, front, left and right side and default
view
2. All pictures must be in jpg, jpeg format not heavier than
200 kb each (print screens with model tree visible)
3. Will be accepted hidden lines and shaded models
In second stage of poling to entering first 5 will be accepted additional
materials which must be prepared or competitor will be disqualified
as we talked about yesterday, I really must stress that the models should be uploaded.. in my opinion it's the only way to judge them properly.. I think it's also the only way that everybody can learn from them!!
Also, might I suggest that the number of point for each catagory be increased from 0-3 to 0-10? the reason for this is that 1-bad- 2-good -3-v.good - but nbothing inbetween.. maybe a slightly finer scale could be added?
Along the same lines, you could break down the catagories into sub catagories.. e.g modeling could be 3 for model complexity, 3 for technique/ease of modificatio, 3 for ease of othes to understand the model (how it's layed out in the model tree) and 1 for discressionary... or something like this..
it's only a suggestion - to try and make the judging more fair accross the board!
I would definately not aggree with 4 above(asm should be allowed)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.