Join our MCAD Central community forums, the largest resource for MCAD (Mechanical Computer-Aided Design) professionals, including files, forums, jobs, articles, calendar, and more.
Fisrt you need to improve your main surface, I mean, you can't leave your san surfacelike it -it's a poor quality-, redefine it, till that point you'll able to make a good parting line, to then generatethe parting surface, to split the stock material
another solution, (if you don't want to redefine your
surfaces, but your part must be a solid)
Please make a mold volume that will be size of core and
cavity both and trim to workpiece it. Then make a parting
surface by your self and split that mold volume.
I absolutely concur with balaganesan. It is not advisable to use that horrible scanned model. Since it's just a fork (simple, complex, or in-between), you sould bring that scanned model into an empty assembly, and overlay a native pro-e model that can be used as a real feature-based database. That is theonly real way to go.
It is better after revese-engineering,you check the quality of the drawing.we are a chinese plastic mold maker,each eah year ,we have so many reverse-engineering and prototype project for new plastic design,and met this kind of problems before.so we make a rule ,after the reverse-engineering,the other drawing engineer will check the drawing,then make decsion.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
