Forums 3D MODELS Jobs Prototype Parts Fast
Pro/E Home Event Calendar MCAD Central Home Pro/E Home
  Active TopicsActive Topics  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Modeling
 Pro/ENGINEER Forum : Modeling
Subject Topic: Simple Surfacing Problem Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
andrewyair
Member
Member


Joined: 02 June 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Posted: 06 July 2008 at 7:23am | IP Logged Quote andrewyair

Well, I hope it is anyway!

All I'm trying to do is create a surface that stretches over the top of the curves that I've generated as per the attached image.



It should be really simple but I've got a bit of a mental block and can't get anywhere with it - any help would be much appreciated!

Thanks, Andrew.
2008-07-06_072315_rear-01.prt.zip
Back to Top View andrewyair's Profile Search for other posts by andrewyair
design-engine
MVP
MVP

Preferred Member

Joined: 14 September 2003
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Posted: 06 July 2008 at 11:42am | IP Logged Quote design-engine

this can be done however it is not a simple solution to your apparent simple problem. First notice that the geometry does not leave any four part boundary.

Thats the only hint I give you for now.   Its kind of like a crossword puzzle. You need practice to get your mind thinking of these solutions. After a while you start to solve these problems in your head like a puzzle. Then the puzzle is not so much fun to solve and you look for more challenging puzzles.   

Edited by design-engine on 06 July 2008 at 11:44am


__________________
Bart Brejcha
DESIGN-ENGINE|EDUCATION
http://www.proetools.com proe training < new

twitter
Back to Top View design-engine's Profile Search for other posts by design-engine
 
c_thompson_68
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 November 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 10:55am | IP Logged Quote c_thompson_68

Attached is my concept of this part, and it is in WF 3.0 as was the original. From the shaded curvature analysis, you can see the areas that need improvement.

I would also be interested in knowing what surface features other Pro-E users recommended for modeling this part. Lately, I have been using SolidWorks and could use a refresher on Pro-E suface modeling techniques.

2008-07-07_105535_rear-01_concept1.zip



Edited by c_thompson_68 on 07 July 2008 at 11:15am
Back to Top View c_thompson_68's Profile Search for other posts by c_thompson_68
 
design-engine
MVP
MVP

Preferred Member

Joined: 14 September 2003
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 1:02pm | IP Logged Quote design-engine

close... There is always a better way. Ill model up a better solution this afternoon.

__________________
Bart Brejcha
DESIGN-ENGINE|EDUCATION
http://www.proetools.com proe training < new

twitter
Back to Top View design-engine's Profile Search for other posts by design-engine
 
csusie
MVP
MVP


Joined: 01 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 437
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 2:27pm | IP Logged Quote csusie

Try this road plan
Back to Top View csusie's Profile Search for other posts by csusie
 
csusie
MVP
MVP


Joined: 01 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 437
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 2:28pm | IP Logged Quote csusie

Something like that anyway
Back to Top View csusie's Profile Search for other posts by csusie
 
c_thompson_68
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 November 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 4:56pm | IP Logged Quote c_thompson_68

I tried this again using the ISDX module (FreeForm Surfacing) inside Pro-E to create a loft surface (instead of boundary blend). It showns improvement, but many Pro-E users do not have the ISDX module unless it was purchased as an extra module.

I would be interested in seeing the Bart's solution. I may try testing this in SolidWorks later to see how it compares to the Pro-E module.

 



Edited by c_thompson_68 on 07 July 2008 at 5:00pm
Back to Top View c_thompson_68's Profile Search for other posts by c_thompson_68
 
csusie
MVP
MVP


Joined: 01 September 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 437
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 5:37pm | IP Logged Quote csusie

Back to Top View csusie's Profile Search for other posts by csusie
 
jeff4136
MVP
MVP

Preferred Member

Joined: 11 August 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1331
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 5:58pm | IP Logged Quote jeff4136

Simple?  No.
Studying variations of that will introduce you to many of
the basic concepts and some of the finer points you'll need
to come to grips with for 'complex shape' modeling.
.
2008-07-07_175701_rect_dome--wf2--.prt.zip
.
Back to Top View jeff4136's Profile Search for other posts by jeff4136
 
design-engine
MVP
MVP

Preferred Member

Joined: 14 September 2003
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Posted: 07 July 2008 at 9:52pm | IP Logged Quote design-engine

Thats what I was thinking. I call that the toupee method because it has a bald spot or a trimmed back four part boundary .... to make in the end a four part boundary.

Its a little extra work but the result is so much nicer. I would not even think of doing it another way.

Edited by design-engine on 07 July 2008 at 9:58pm


__________________
Bart Brejcha
DESIGN-ENGINE|EDUCATION
http://www.proetools.com proe training < new

twitter
Back to Top View design-engine's Profile Search for other posts by design-engine
 

Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.3125 seconds.
 


About Us | Contact Us | Report a Bug | Tell a Friend | Advertise | Site Map | Click here to access RSS feeds.