Hello!
I was wondering if FlexLM (version) has any influence on Pro/E workstation performance.
We used to have 2001 datecode 2001240 and older version of FlexLM. Our Pro/E supplier advised us to upgrade Pro/E to datecode 2002350 and FlexLM to version 1.8 (I think).
Now, month later we noticed degradation of performance of almost all Pro/E workstations.
Typically, performance degradation occurs when working with large assemblies and drawings of those. For example, when I switch from DWG to model and back and do regeneration, DWG actions become very slow.
I don't think there's any memory issue, because before the upgrade, everything was quite well.
Is there any comparison list of working FlexLM versions and Pro/E datecodes? Are all newer versions of FlexLM fully compatible with all newer datecodes of Pro/E 2001?
Regards,
Skraba
I was wondering if FlexLM (version) has any influence on Pro/E workstation performance.
We used to have 2001 datecode 2001240 and older version of FlexLM. Our Pro/E supplier advised us to upgrade Pro/E to datecode 2002350 and FlexLM to version 1.8 (I think).
Now, month later we noticed degradation of performance of almost all Pro/E workstations.
Typically, performance degradation occurs when working with large assemblies and drawings of those. For example, when I switch from DWG to model and back and do regeneration, DWG actions become very slow.
I don't think there's any memory issue, because before the upgrade, everything was quite well.
Is there any comparison list of working FlexLM versions and Pro/E datecodes? Are all newer versions of FlexLM fully compatible with all newer datecodes of Pro/E 2001?
Regards,
Skraba