This question is more about administering/changing management than it is administering Pro-E, but I would think this would be the place to get an answer.
We've switched over to Pro-E over the last couple of years. The problem I face as the admin is what to do with the years and years of legacy data (Cadds5) we have to deal with. We have years of drawings and models from our product that are still being used. As a result, many of our engineers are forced to work on the Cadds5 system to maintain our legacy data. Many have forgotten everything they were taught about Pro-E. Only new developement is done on Pro-E.
How can I get management to realize this situation and see the benefit of making a mandantory switch to Pro-E? Have any of you had to face this? What did your company do?
Thanks
We've switched over to Pro-E over the last couple of years. The problem I face as the admin is what to do with the years and years of legacy data (Cadds5) we have to deal with. We have years of drawings and models from our product that are still being used. As a result, many of our engineers are forced to work on the Cadds5 system to maintain our legacy data. Many have forgotten everything they were taught about Pro-E. Only new developement is done on Pro-E.
How can I get management to realize this situation and see the benefit of making a mandantory switch to Pro-E? Have any of you had to face this? What did your company do?
Thanks